5 yr cover up of most serious nature

A Clinical Psychologist ordered and enforced that my child live with someone other than me and that I could not see her unaccompanied, in absence of any s/g referrals or orders from anyone qualified to make them. This happened ‘coincidentally’ immediately following me raising concerns about her ordering my daughter to visit and attend the hospital unaccompanied, in the absence of any discussion with or consent from me. I have always been the only person with PR. CP lied about her actions to the HCPC who disclosed that she’d actually documented some of them in her own notes, whilst she and those ‘investigating’ all denied any evidence of this - her Mx withheld information requested by HCPC for so long she was told she could face her own FTP investigation if she continued to ignore their contact. CP also ordered my daughter’s school to remove all of my contact details and replace them with someone she knew not to hold PR, with my knowledge or consent. BCH did the same thing and have been forced as a result of a CQC investigation to admit breaching my PR status or revising the policy that allowed this to happen as promised by the CEO in 2018, which hadn’t been done, despite all being aware of the risks it posed. My MP has written to CS and confirmed there have never been any processes against me. The CP and all of those ‘investigating’ have been persistently dishonest and failed to comply with DoC or conduct an open and transparent investigation or speak with any of those involved in a bid to cover up what has been done. The ICO are also involved snd have upheld my complaints because BWC have failed to comply with SARs and FOIs. The CP is still practising. I have not seen my only child for nearly 5 years as a result of her ordering and enforcing a change of residence and that I wasn’t allowed to see her unsupervised - all orders which she was wholly unqualified to make in the absence of any mandatory processes. I am now proceeding with legal action. This needs independent investigation and action as a matter of urgency. The CEO is aware and has refused to allow me to even raise some complaints formally, and the FR letter was withheld for almost a year after requesting it, thus deliberately preventing me from escalating to the PHSO by making sure I was timed out. The Trust have refused to engage at every turn and have failed to tell my daughter the truth that the CP acted outside the Scope of her Practice (as the HCPC found), because doing so would mean being confronted with having to admit to the CP’s actions and misconduct. The Trust are far more concerned with protecting their reputation than the well-being of my child whom they had a Duty of Care to by continuing to force her to believe that I am not ‘allowed’ to be with her. Urgent action and intervention needed.